New Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.10.1 CPU Performance Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Skylake, Ryzen 7. I know that a 6 AMD would give me at 60-100% increased performance in "pasive" tasks (1:1 previews, smart previews and exporting) but i wonder how much performance i'd get on active tasks. And yeah Lightroom need to improve their multi core performance. If I were to guess based on pure specs, renders in Premiere might be a few seconds faster with the newer P4000, but in Photoshop, performance will be virtually the same. All this means is that if you don't have a problem with longer export times and don't often use smart previews, Intel is likely to still feel a bit "snappier" in Lightroom Classic. Doesn't matter how fast the drive is if the CPU/RAM is the bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 5800X does not do quite as well, but still manages to barely out-score the Intel Core i9 10900K by 1%. It may be a year or two before Ryzen II addresses all of its limitations, until then, we have the 32 core Naples to look forward too. In this article, we will primarily be looking at how well the new Ryzen 3600, 3700X, 3800X, and 3900X perform in Lightroom Classic. needed to perform a task (the lower the better), but the scores are... well, scores (the higher the better) - this is a little confusing as there is no clear explanation of this in the table. Looking very seriously at the upcoming Cascade Lake X i9-10980XE or Ryzen 9 3950X, but leaning towards the Intel for its greater OC headroom. These test configurations include three different platforms along with six different CPU models. Lightroom CC 2015.10.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Kaby Lake, Ryzen 7, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Performance, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 includes an eight-core Ryzen 9 4800HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q graphics, 16GB of DDR4/3200 memory, a 1TB PCIe 3.0 SSD, a 14-inch FHD screen, and a weight … You can try optimizing your current system for running faster during your work time ;)---end edit//With i7-6700k you should have 1151 socket board - so just throw in there i9-9900k. All of the CPUs besides ryzen and 7700k are using 32gb of ram. Really glad to see you guys did this post too. What was the resolution of the monitor? Small question, why didn't you go with X570 MB with TB3 support for Lightroom workstation build instead of the GB board? Whenever a new generation of CPUs is launched, the main question everyone wants answered is how fast they are. Some game software was optimized for Intel products and until they get their hands on AMD, you see a loss of frames on some games. We see similar margins when running the Puget Systems Lightroom Classic benchmark. You are right that the 7700k should feel overall snappier and is better for photo editing work in general. Why not get 30-40% more speed for free (other than power and heat)? I mainly intend to use the system for photo editing. I would love to run this benchmark to test mine system (just to see & laugh).--EDIT: well, I forgot that Intel is changing their chipset almost every gen. Well, having Z170 or similar you need to switch mobo too. 1700x - Same scenario - 100% CPU utilisation on all cores - machine feels fully loaded with tasks, unresponsive in general.Can't do any other selections etc. It really depends on if your work is going to be more CUDA dominant or OpenCL. I have a Ryzen system and the same Prime X370 Pro board and when 4 Dimms are used memory speed is capped so why not try 2 Dimms? As far as the Intel X-series and AMD Threadripper processors go, there honestly isn't much to talk about. As I understood, higher scores is better, right? Puget Systems Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT. Thanks for this Matt! That is definitely something we want to expand on, but in general I think those two tests should be relatively accurate for slider responsiveness. Remember his Mb was Gigabyte X570.Maximum Memory is 3200 Mhzhttps://www.pugetsystems.co... No, it is oveclocked xmp memory. http://wccftech.com/amd-ryz... We aren't planning on testing with Windows 7 at this point since Windows 7 no longer has mainstream support from Microsoft and the existing supply has nearly dried up to the point that we soon won't be able to sell it on our workstations at all. We try to compensate by running the benchmark multiple times and taking the best overall run, but you still get those kinds of discrepancies. I'm actually not 100% sure when we will have the Lr benchmark up for download, but probably in the next couple months. (3.7-4GHz Turbo) 6 Core - we will be basing the majority of our conclusions with HT/SMT disabled in the instances that it improves performance. I'm currently running LR on my I7-6700 and since i'm doing about 2000-4000 pics a month editing, there are times when i'd like a faster machine. Honestly, I would just leave it alone and not worry about it - you probably wouldn't notice a difference unless you got out a stopwatch and started timing things. Anyway, my next machine will be based on AMD then :) thanks again for your effort, this test is a real benchmark of how CPU should be really tested in software... 1) Yes, GPU acceleration is pretty much always enabled in our testing unless otherwise noted. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles for the latest information on how these CPUs perform with a variety of software packages. We dropped 1:1 preview testing when we switched over to using Adobe's plugin API as much as possible and you unfortunately can't tell Lightroom to generate 1:1 previews through the API for some reason. Is it right, that 9900k simply destroys everything, if I work with 8k timelapses (42mp)? If it's less than 15% .. i wouldnt go all the trouble. I currently use a 10-core i7-6950X OC'd to 4.4GHz on all cores and still want more speed for LR and Premiere Pro. Really happy that the bottlenecks are removed for AMD, as they look even better now with the 3800 - 3950 series. Interestingly, the difference between the two Ryzen CPUs was just a small 1% for this task so if you do decide to use Ryzen and primarily care about export times, you might as well save money and use the Ryzen 7 1700X. Just remember, this is not free performance - it is overclocking and has many of the same stability risks associated with something like CPU or GPU overclocking. We hope to have things ready pretty shortly after launch, but it all depends on exactly when the launch is. Let me setup a bit of context here: I'm in events photography where high multitasking efficiency is very desirable. Would this not explain, in part, the performance improvements? AMD was more focused on IPC gain in Ryzen, and under developed in other areas which tend to be underutilized (like AVX). As for the 6800K vs 7770K, it is hard to say for certain if you plan to overclock. $3498. ... 2019 iMac Pro vs 2019 Custom PC by Puget Systems: Lightroom … The only caveat is that for many of the active tasks in Lightroom Classic (scrolling through images, switching between modules, etc. I think it's a bad call to buy a 7700K for work like this. My observation on 9900K vs 1700x (not exactly a direct competitor but they have similar export/rendering power) is as follows: 9900K - Renders a timelapse with LRtimelpse from ~600 RAW files (files from A7III downscaling to 4K). Changes in core count/price are coming.I don't think you're gonna have 15% gain in "active tasks" with 3600x over 6700. In Adobe Lightroom Classic, the Intel Core 10th Gen processors such as the i9 10900K and i7 10700K do very well in active tasks like scrolling through images and switch modules - coming in at about 5% faster than a similarly priced AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen CPU. If Adobe can get it's head out regarding … Thanks Matt. I couldn't find this info in the text, sorry if I missed it. I definitely OC my rigs. No problem at all! loss than the amount that would be saved by having faster RAM. 4 slots populated with 16GB modules each gives a maximum of 64GB. Even worse, if you compare Ryzen to the even more affordable Core i7 7700K, it falls further behind. Between Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 3700x, is there a notice difference in speed? Happy Compute! 19. Not making excuses for Adobe specifically here, just explaining that the idea that "everything should use all the cores!" Performance per dollar, I feel WX 7100 offers a much better value - especially after the latest AMD Radeon Pro Adrenalin Edition driver which radically improved performance across the board! I'm getting great performance with the Lightroom Classic and my custom Windows 10 Pro workstation with AMD Ryzen 7 1800x and Radeon Pro WX 7100 GPU. PugetSystems: Intel i9-7940x, 7960X & 7980XE vs TR 1950x benchmarks LightRoom, Photoshop, After Effect, Maya 3D, Cinema 4D. Different story here. Also, if we are at this topic - are you going to test the GPU acceleration some-time in the future? I might do a 'light' overclock but has there been any change in terms of ACTIVE tasks with the latest version of LR?Just how noticeable are the active tasks between an i7 9700k and say an AMD equivalent?In my case passive tasks aren't an issue. Does the performance on Smart previews reflect the performance of 1:1 previews ? The 3950X and TR 3rd gen we'll just have to wait and see. That is another important consideration for me - Any guesses on how 3950x will fare in these benchmarks? Perhaps 3800x>3900x by benchmark is a good indicator of 3900x>3950x improvement? Every time I do some LR testing I give another few techniques a try - hopefully one of these LR updates will introduce something that I can use to improve our testing even further. Option 2: Launch Lightroom Classic and go to "File -> Plug-in … But if you move it too fast, LR lags out and the brush starts skipping around. In fact, that means that the Ryzen 5 3600 is faster than even the Core i9 9900K for these two tasks! (3.5-4GHz Turbo) 8 Core For exporting, I would look at the "Export 100 images" which was RAW to JPG. Based on Gamers Nexus recent youtube video on Ryzen memory tuning, gains of 8-10% are possible using 3866 c16 downclocked to 3800 and 1900mhz FCLOCK. While most of our PC test platforms are using DDR4-2666 memory, we did decide to upgrade to DDR4-3200 for the AMD Ryzen platform which is different from our past testing where we used DDR4-3000 for Ryzen. Not necessarily for Lightroom, but for Lightroom we also wouldn't recommend an X99 system in the first place - a Z270 system with a 7700K is going to be better overall. I'm totally aware this is not something scientific but nevertheless super valuable. The first is exporting images where Ryzen was 10-11% faster than the Intel Core i7 7700K. This is not gaming benchmarks. ECC RAM is what we use in our X99 workstations that is what we wanted to test with. Information on the Utah State University - contacts, students, faculty, finances. Chrome, YouTube, file explorer Windows) is all it takes to feel the big difference :). Do you recommend WX 7100 or Quadro P4000 for Lightroom/Photoshop/Premiere suite? Unless the editing is really a pain for you. When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. Graduates of Utah State University - the names, photos, skill, job, location. I did buy the AMD ryzen as the i7 7700k is much more expensive in India (at the time of writing this). This is very useful. - Do you think 3rd gen Ryzen using gen 4 NVME would change any of these results meaningfully? None of our Lightroom testing should need more than ~20GB of RAM so the amount of memory in each system shouldn't cause any performance difference. By all accounts, it does seem that AMD might have been better off delaying the launch by a month. This does still mean that our testing is a bit biased in favor of Ryzen since we decided to stick with DDR4-2666 for the Intel and AMD Threadripper platforms, but as you will see in the final results, that extra performance in a couple of tests is not really going to change our conclusions so we are not too worried about it. Since the Ryzen CPUs we tested are only about $100-200 cheaper than the i7 6850K, that is a pretty large difference in performance. Has there been any updates to LR CC that help Ryzen performance since this article was published? Or maybe it is the difference between the more typical L3 cache on AMD and "Smart Cache" on Intel or even the maturity of Hyperthreading on Intel. TLDR: it's possible to still interact with the machine for light multitasking operations. Puget Systems Lightroom Workstation – 4.1 (4.6) GHz twelve core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Nvidia GeForce 2060 Super (8 GB), 64 GB RAM, 2 TB NVMe SSD. It's so fresh that it hasn't been fully optimized yet. A few quick questions if you have a minute: - You mention in the article that something like a 9900K could feel snappier than a 3900x, but the scrolling, module switch, and auto-develop benchmarks are within like 2-3% at most. Thank you so much! That's the main benefit. We just wanted to note that since there are some people who really don't export a ton of images, but do a lot of edit work directly in Lightroom. That is just a fact of life with this kind of testing.3) I hear you, and thanks for the feedback! I'm still able to jump to a different catalogue, start making my picks, possibly even do some light editing (slightly slower ofc but doable). In the case of AMD's Ryzen, there are also a lot of questions surrounding how they compare to the processors available from Intel. Thanks so much for your great work!I'm on a i7-7700k system at the moment and am thinking of upgrading to an i7 9th gen 9700k. Not perfect, but certainly more accurate than making a wild guess. RAM speed is something we get asked about semi-regularly, but to be honest we don't have any testing planned to cover it at the moment. The images and settings we used in our testing were: 18MP (5184x3456) Now, however, we have and are currently planning on offering DDR4-3200 for our customers once JEDEC 3200MHz RAM is readily available so we will be doing our testing with that speed of RAM. Ryzen has seen about a 7% increase in performance since this article was published, but it looks like this is from general optimizations than anything AMD specific since Intel also saw performance gains. I would think that for processing batches of images at a time they could do better, since each photo could be handled in its own thread, but for working on a single image some operations may simply not thread well. I'm not actually 100% sure to be honest. It has 25% more cores and boost clocks are a bit higher at 4.7Ghz. Which test would be show exporting performance of Canon DPP (from RAW to 8 bit TIFF)? Phoronix's Darktable-on-Linux benchmarks ought not to be a too dissimilar CPU challenge, and there the AMD chips come out looking rather better. Absolutely! Right now, DDR4-2400 appears to be rock solid and even DDR4-2666 shouldn't be a problem, but going beyond that we feel is a bit of a risk. That is really, really hard to test consistently and accurately, especially when comparing CPUs where the difference is likely going to be minimal. Greater Salt Lake City Area Embedded Systems Engineer Computer Hardware Education Utah State University 1988 — 1992 BS, Electical Engineering Experience Beijer Electronics, Inc. August 2008 - … The subjective "snappier" interface feel is suspect, IMO. It is one of the more "finicky" benchmarks we have since we have to use a lot of external scripts to do things that can't be done through the plug-in API. The other interesting result is generating 1:1 previews. Great article. CPU utilisation on 100% on all cores. On a 12core system you have room for having other apps rendering in the background. It's be interesting to see what the results would be if you were to script up parallel instances of Adobe's DNG converter to do the same 100 conversions. Be sure to install the new AMD Radeon Pro Adrenalin Edition Driver with it! Recommended Systems For: Adobe After Effects; ... Ryzen Workstations based on AMD Ryzen B550 and X570; ... is using three Puget Systems … Would greatly appreciate hearing your thoughts on this,Kind regards. And exactly as you've mentioned opening a few tabs here and there (eg. However, if you are concerned primarily about export times, the i7 6850K is about 40% faster at exporting images in addition to being 11-16% faster for everything else - all for only a small increase in price. This should give way more bang for the bucks. Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Are the Ryzen 3rd generation CPUs good for Lightroom Classic? But still... How many photographers out there OC their rigs? Not only will we include results for a few of the previous generation Ryzen CPUs, but also the latest AMD Threadripper, Intel 9th Gen, and Intel X-series CPUs. Especially with brushes, if you move the brush too slow you won't see any difference between hardware. One last reminder: due to the HT/SMT performance issue in Lightroom Classic, our analysis from this point forward will be done with HT/SMT disabled whenever it resulted in a higher overall score. If Lightroom wants to use 18GB, but you only have 16GB that is going to be a big performance hit - much more of a hit than having faster RAM could ever cover. This is a short tutorial/comparison video on how to run run Puget After Effects Benchmark. Auf welchem Niveau ist die GPU-Beschleunigung einer Ryzen APU (konkret: 4650G) in Lightroom/Photoshop zu erwarten? Hey, you are running XMP overclocked memory on AMD, and stock jedec crap on Intel. We discovered an issue with Intel Hyperthreading and AMD SMT that causes low performance for some tasks. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic. Hi Matt, after many bios and drivers updates, Ryzen performance has increased overall. Now the question is: Do the new AMD CPU's react the same way to full load scenarios? I could not tell that was the reason....given how the article was written. Great, thank you ! You may want to skip over the 3800X since the 3700X performs almost exactly the same, but all the other models are great choices. I assume they have....correct? Considering that Ryzen is also either slower or comparable to these two Intel CPU options in other programs like Photoshop, Intel CPUs are a pretty clear winner for photo editing and image processing workstations. I use Lightroom everyday. Buy with confidence! On the flip side, the Intel Hyperthreading (HT) and AMD SMT issue are still very much present - you can read the details about it in our support post Hyperthreading & SMT causing low performance in Lightroom Classic. Not saying you can't do it of course, but just be aware of the potential issues before jumping into it. I keep zooming in and out and that's where I lose most of my time. In addition, we will have a separate table in the "Benchmark Results" section that has the results with HT/SMT enabled on every CPU that supports it. Normally we would go through the results on a test by test basis, but this time the results were remarkably consistent across the various tests. These are absolutely amazing results, but it is worth pointing out that for most of the "active" tests, such as scrolling through images and switching between modules, the Intel 9th gen processors are a bit faster than AMD. the latter ones have faster clock... 3800x is basically an overclocked 3700x. I'm a landscape photographer that lives in LR, working through thousands of very large RAW images per outing. Doing this does not improve performance with every CPU, however, so we are going to clearly mark in the charts when the results are with HT/SMT off. Monopolies like Adobe do not really spend time on optimization. Hi! Puget Systems. All I need is 10-bit support to run my 10-bit monitors. The only exception to this is our new brush lag test where AMD holds a firm lead. We generally recommend a GTX 1060 as a starting point on our systems, but if you are in a budget crunch something a bit lower should be fine. They probably won't, that's true, they are too lazy. That really good news! However, Lightroom Classic currently heavily favors AMD processors for passive tasks like exporting which allows the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen …